BAIL APPLN./3014/2019 of PARVEEN SAINI Vs THE STATE

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2020-01-16

Parties

+ BAIL APPLN. 3014/2019 PARVEEN SAINI (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 3014/2019PARVEEN SAINI..... PetitionerPARVEEN SAINI..... Petitioner

ThroughMr. Hemant Gulati, Adv.

versus

THE STATE

..... Respondent

ThroughMr. Hirein Sharma, APP for StateSI Anuj Kumar, Special/SWR CellS.I. Ajay Kumar, ASI Anil Tyagi, PS,Rajouri GardenSI Anuj Kumar, Special/SWR CellS.I. Ajay Kumar, ASI Anil Tyagi, PS,Rajouri Garden

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAITO R R%16.01.2020

Dr.Preet Singh Chawla states that in his certificate he neversuggested any surgery for removal of pus from gallbladder, therefore, thecertificate has been wrongly misunderstood by the petitioner.

On perusal of the certificate in question, nowhere it is mentioned thatDr. Preet Singh Chawla has suggested any surgery for removal of pus fromgallbladder. Accordingly, presence of Dr. Preet Chawla is dispensed with.

Keeping in view the fact that no surgery is required, therefore, Ihereby dismissed the application.

JANUARY 16, 2020/ms

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J