W.P.(CRL)/1252/2020 of SUBHASH CHANDRA ARORA (SENIOR CITIZEN) & ANR. Vs THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
Parties
- MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA ARORA (SENIOR CITIZEN) & ANR (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
via Video-conferencing
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1252/2020
MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA ARORA (SENIOR CITIZEN) & ANR.
..... Petitioners Through: Mr. M. Hasibuddin, Mr. Ratneshwar Kumar & Mr. Sourav Ghosh, Advs. versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R R % 18.08.2020
The petitioners, both of whom are senior citizens and the parents-in-law of respondent No. 2, seek police protection against the actions of respondent No. 2, who it is alleged, is interfering in their peaceful living.
2.Mr. M. Hasibuddin, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that respondent No. 2 was married to the petitioners’ son, who they had disowned back in 2010. The son however passed away on 14.06.2020.
3.Counsel submits that in any case the son and respondent No. 2 had been living away from the petitioners alongwith their child and the petitioners had no relations with them. Now however, it is contended, that respondent No. 2 has been harassing and threatening the petitioners with ulterior motive.Though complaints dated 08.06.2014, 14.11.2017, and most recently dated 08.08.2020, have been made to
the police authorities, apart from several distress calls to the PCR; however the petitioners’ grievance has not been addressed.
Be that as it may, what Mr. Hasibuddin prays for today is that the petitioners, being senior citizens, be permitted quick and effective recourse by the police authorities in the event respondent No. 2 creates any trouble.
5.Issue notice.
6.Mr. Avi Singh, learned ASC appears for the State on advance copy ; accepts notice ; and submits that without getting further into the controversy, in view of what is submitted, the cellphone number of the SHO, P.S. : Mansarovar Park as also of the concerned Beat Constable shall be provided to the petitioners and appropriate directions will be issued to the police officers to respond promptly in case of any eventuality. accepts notice ; and submits that without getting further into the controversy, in view of what is submitted, the cellphone number of the SHO, P.S. : Mansarovar Park as also of the concerned Beat Constable shall be provided to the petitioners and appropriate directions will be issued to the police officers to respond promptly in case of any eventuality.
7.This is acceptable to learned counsel for the petitioners in satisfaction of the prayers made in the writ petition. of the prayers made in the writ petition.
8.Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, taking on record the statement made on behalf of the State; and directing the concerned police officials to be prompt and responsive to the petitioners’ complaints in case of any need. statement made on behalf of the State; and directing the concerned police officials to be prompt and responsive to the petitioners’ complaints in case of any need.
9.The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
AUGUST 18, 2020/uj
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.