NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(CRL)/869/2021 of BRIJ MOHAN GARG AND ORS. Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2021-05-18
Case number
105 of 2020

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 18.05.2021

+ W.P.(CRL) 869/2021

BRIJ MOHAN GARG & ORS. ....Petitioners

Through: Mr. Akshit Sawal, Adv.

versus

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC (Crl) with Ms. Shivani Sharma and Ms. Surabhi Katyal, Advs. with ASI Laltesh, PS North Rohini for State/R-1 Mr. Ravin Rao, Adv. for R-2 to 6 Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC (Crl) with Ms. Shivani Sharma and Ms. Surabhi Katyal, Advs. with ASI Laltesh, PS North Rohini for State/R-1 Mr. Ravin Rao, Adv. for R-2 to 6

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1.Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for

quashing of FIR No.105/2020 registered at PS – North Rohini, Delhi and all

other proceedings arising therefrom.

2.Notice issued.

3.Notice is accepted by learned ASC for State and by counsel for

respondent nos.2 to 6 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. petition is taken up for final disposal.

4.The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled

their disputes and respondent nos.2 to 6 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

5.Respondent nos.2 to 6 are personally present in Court through video

conferencing with their counsel and they have been identified by ASI Laltesh/IO and submit that matter has been settled as the issues in question

arose on account of misunderstanding and they do not wish to prosecute the

matter any further.

6.Petitioners and respondent nos.2 to 6 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Compromise Deed dated 08.04.2021.

7.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

8.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.105/2020 registered at PS –

North Rohini, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are

quashed.

9.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

MAY 18, 2021/rk

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE