CRL.M.C./1184/2021 of VARUN SHARMA & ORS. Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2021-04-13
Case number: 1184/2021

Parties

Mr. Rahul Saxena, Adv (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 13.04.2021

CRL.M.C. 1184/2021

VARUN SHARMA & ORS.

.... Petitioners

Through

Mr. Rahul Saxena, Adv.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Vineet Kumar, PS Harsh Vihar Mr. Anil Dutt Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 6054/2021 (exemption)

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1184/2021

3.Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of

FIR No.38/2020, registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.11.2017 as per

Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 17.04.2018. and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 17.04.2018.

7.Petitioners and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide MoU/Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 31.07.2020 and settled all their disputes amicably. vide MoU/Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 31.07.2020 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8.Complainant is present in person and has been identified by SI Vineet Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further. FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.38/2020, registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

APRIL 13, 2021/rk

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE