NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./124/2021 of JAMSHED ALI Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2021-01-15
Case number
124/2021

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 124/2021

JAMSHED ALI

Date of decision: 15.01.2021

..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Alok Vajpayee, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents

Through

Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with ASI Dharampal, PS Saket with ASI Dharampal, PS Saket

Mr. (appearance not given), Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T(ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

Crl. M.A.603/2021 (Exemption)

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 124/2021

3.Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for

quashing of FIR No. 390/2017 dated 27.08.2017, registered at PS Saket and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is

allowed.

7.Respondent no. 2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and they have been identified by SI Dharmender/IO and submits that matter

has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8.Petitioners and respondent no. 2 has settled their disputes and have entered into an amicable settlement vide Compromise Deed dated 12.11.2020.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 390/2017 dated 27.08.2017, registered at PS Saket and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12.The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

JANUARY 15, 2021/rk