CRL.M.C./173/2021 of ANKIT @ JAI KUMAR Vs THE STATE & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2021-01-21
Case number: 173/2021

Parties

Mr. Niraj Choudhary, Adv (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of decision: January 21, 2021

+ CRL.M.C. 173/2021

ANKIT @ JAI KUMAR

..... Petitioner

Through

Mr. Niraj Choudhary, Adv.

versus

THE STATE & ANR.

.... Respondents

Through

Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Anju, Vijay Vihar, Delhi

Mr. Jitendra Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL)

CRL. M.A.872/2021

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.173/2021

3.Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR

No.1329/2017, dated 05.11.2017 registered at Police Station Vijay

Vihar, Delhi, and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

Crl.M.C.173/2021 Page 1 of 3

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by learned

counsel for respondent No.2 present in the Court through video conferencing and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.

6.With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

7.The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8.Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and she has been identified by SI Anju/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.Petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Compromise Deed/MoU dated 08.01.2021.

10.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined

to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting

Crl.M.C.173/2021 Page 2 of 3

petitioners any further.

11. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.1329/2017, dated

05.11.2017 registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi and

consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12.The petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

13.The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.

JANUARY 21, 2021 rk

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

Crl.M.C.173/2021 Page 3 of 3