BAIL APPLN./3591/2021 of CHANDRA MOHAN KHANDELWAL Vs THE STATE & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2023-07-19
Case number: 529 of 2021

Parties

CHANDRA MOHAN KHANDELWAL (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ORS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

Signature Not Verified

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3591/2021

CHANDRA MOHAN KHANDELWAL ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar and Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, Advs. Vashisht, Advs.

versus

THE STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Amit Sahni, APP for the State with W/PSI Kiran Dayal, PS Moti Nagar with W/PSI Kiran Dayal, PS Moti Nagar

% Date of Decision: 19th July, 2023

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

J U M N T

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1.This is petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 529/2021 under Sections 354 IPC, under Section 8 of POCSO Act, under Section 3/4 Child Labour Act and under Section 79 JJ Act registered at Police Station: Moti Nagar. seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 529/2021 under Sections 354 IPC, under Section 8 of POCSO Act, under Section 3/4 Child Labour Act and under Section 79 JJ Act registered at Police Station: Moti Nagar.

2.The briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR was registered on the statement of prosecutrix ‘J’ on 29.08.2021, wherein she alleged thatshe was working along with her mother and brother at Home Sajawat Showroom where her petitioner/boss used to molest registered on the statement of prosecutrix ‘J’ on 29.08.2021, wherein she alleged thatshe was working along with her mother and brother at Home Sajawat Showroom where her petitioner/boss used to molest

BAIL APPLN. 3591/2021

her.

3.It is submitted that the Interim protection was granted by this Court vide order dated 01.10.2021 which is continuing till date. IO has stated that the charge sheet has already been filed and the petitioner had joined the investigation as and when directed. vide order dated 01.10.2021 which is continuing till date. IO has stated that the charge sheet has already been filed and the petitioner had joined the investigation as and when directed.

4.There is also no report of misuse of the liberty granted to the petitioner by this Court. petitioner by this Court.

5.In these circumstances, as the charge sheet has already been filed, the petitioner is admitted to bail on furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- with surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court subject to the conditions: petitioner is admitted to bail on furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- with surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court subject to the conditions:

(a)the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses and shall not tamper with the evidence in any manner; witnesses and shall not tamper with the evidence in any manner;

(b)the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation;

(c)the petitioner shall disclose his mobile number in the bail

bond;

(d)in case of change of residential address and/or mobile number, the petitioner shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/ Court concerned by way of an affidavit.number, the petitioner shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/ Court concerned by way of an affidavit.

6.With these directions, the present bail application stands disposed of.

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

BAIL APPLN. 3591/2021

Signature Not Verified

JULY 19, 2023/Pallavi

BAIL APPLN. 3591/2021