W.P.(C)/7924/2023 of RAMESH CHANDRA SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Parties
- RAMESH CHANDRA SINGH (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
Signature Not Verified
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 31[st] May, 2023
+ W.P.(C) 7924/2023
RAMESH CHANDRA SINGH
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Risabh Sahu, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Ravindra Vikram, GP, Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law), BSF
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
J U M N T (oral)
1.Vide this petition, petitioner is praying as under:
“(i) Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, thereby calling for records and quash the impugned order dated 13.05.2022 issued by the DG BSF FHQ to the extent that it was issued under the remark, "ON OWN REQUEST", instead of compassionate/terminal grounds.
(ii) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, thereby directing the respondents to modify the impugned order dated 13.05.2022 issued by the DG BSF FHQ to the extent that it may be issued under the remark, "compassionate/terminal grounds", instead of "ON OWN REQUEST".
(iii) Alternatively, issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, thereby directing the respondents to award the petitioner Transfer allowance (TA) for the impugned transfer
W.P.(C) 7924/2023 Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
order because there is no rules specifying the minimum tenure of DIG at static location and thus the petitioner is entitled to Transfer allowance (TA) even if posted to his choice of posting..”
2.In view of the prayer and averments made in the present petition, we hereby direct the respondents to treat the present petition as representation on behalf of petitioner and decide the same within one week. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within three days thereafter with reasoned order.
3.With the aforesaid directions, present petition is disposed of.
4.Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representation, he may approach the appropriate forum.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE
MAY 31, 2023/rk
W.P.(C) 7924/2023 Page 2 of 2