W.P.(C)/11004/2023 of AMAR NATH SINGH Vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-02-22
Case number: 11004/2023

Parties

Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Adv. with Mr. Akhil Rexwal, Mr. D. Raj, Ms. Tripti Juyal and Mr. Aditya Kumar Rathi, Advs. with Mr. Akhil Rexwal, Mr. D. Raj, Ms. Tripti Juyal and Mr. Aditya Kumar Rathi, A (PETITIONER)
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

ARB.P./1283/2024 of AMAR CONSTRUCTIONS Vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11004/2023

AMAR NATH SINGH

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Adv. with Mr. Akhil Rexwal, Mr. D. Raj, Ms. Tripti Juyal and Mr. Aditya Kumar Rathi, Advs. with Mr. Akhil Rexwal, Mr. D. Raj, Ms. Tripti Juyal and Mr. Aditya Kumar Rathi, Advs.

versus

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Sandeep Devashish Das, Adv. with Ms. Kanak Malik, Adv. for GNCTD. with Ms. Kanak Malik, Adv. for GNCTD.

Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Ms. Harshita Gupta, Counsel with Ms. Harshita Gupta,

Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha and Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advs. for NDMC. Shubham Mishra, Advs. for NDMC.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJUO R R% 10.04.2024

CM APPL. 21709/2024 in REVIEW PET. 163/2024 [Condonation of

delay in filing the Review Petition].

1.For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

2.The application is disposed of.

REVIEW PET. 163/2024

3.The petitioner seeks review of the order dated 22.02.2024. According to the petitioner, the said order is passed on an erroneous assumption that the name of the petitioner does not feature in the list of 628 street vendors. The petitioner states that, in fact, his name features in the said list.

4.Issue notice.

5.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents accept notice and seek time to take instructions and, if necessary, file reply. time to take instructions and, if necessary, file reply.

6.List on 24.04.2024.

7.It is clarified that, if the review petition is allowed, the Petition would be heard on merits. be heard on merits.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

APRIL 10, 2024/SA

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

Click here to check corrigendum, if any