NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/13305/2024 of HAIDAR ALI Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2024-09-23
Case number
13305/2024

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13305/2024 HAIDAR ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saroj Kumar Singh and Ms. Shilpa Saini, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, Adv. with Ms. Shivarant, Asst. Cmdt., CISF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R R% 23.09.2024

CM APPL. 55552/2024

1.Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 13305/2024

3.By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, the petitioner, who is serving in the Central Industrial Security Force

(CISF), has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-

“a) Quash/stay the Disciplinary Enquiry commenced vide Charge Memorandum dated 19.7.2024 & action qua the Petitioner with immediate effect”; and/or

b) Pass any other order(s)/direction(s) or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and property under the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice in favour of the Petitioner.”

4.At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, opposes the writ petition for want of territorial

jurisdiction.

5.In the light of this objection taken by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the competent Court, having the necessary territorial jurisdiction. 6.Accordingly, as prayed for, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court, having the requisite territorial jurisdiction, making it clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s claim.

REKHA PALLI, J

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024/ss

SHALINDER KAUR, J