NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/16033/2022 of HIMANSU SEKHAR BAL Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2024-04-08
Case number
16011/2022

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 2 detected)

2 case citations detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~32 to 34

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 16011/2022

DEBADUTTA SAHOO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudarsh Menon, Mr. Samarendra Beura and Ms. Usha Rani Pradhan, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents

Through: Ms. Archana Sharma, Adv.

W.P.(C) 16033/2022

HIMANSU SEKHAR BAL ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sudarsh Menon, Mr. Samarendra Beura and Ms. Usha Rani Pradhan, Advs. Beura and Ms. Usha Rani Pradhan, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Archana Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP and Ms. Mishika Pandita, Adv.

W.P.(C) 16176/2023, CM APPL. 65045/2023

DEBADUTTA SAHOO ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sudarsh Menon, Mr. Samarendra Beura and Ms. Usha Rani Pradhan, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents

Through:

Ms. Archana Sharma, Adv. Mr. Akash Vajpai, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP and Mr. Sonu Kumar, Adv.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEO R R08.04.2024

1.Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the judgment of Full Bench of this Court in the case of Squdron Leader Neelam Chahar vs. Union of India & Ors. in W.P.(C) 9139/2019, these petitions be transferred to the AFT, Calcutta.

2.We are not inclined to transfer these petitions. Appropriate shall be that the petitioners shall file fresh OA before the Tribunal within period of four weeks from today.

3.Suffice to state the period during which the petitioners were prosecuting these petitions in this Court shall be excluded for the purpose of determining the limitation.

4.The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

5.A copy of this order be kept in all petitions.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

APRIL 8, 2024/rr

SAURABH BANERJEE, J