RC.REV./157/2024 of SURJAN SINGH Vs VISHAL JAIN & ORS.
Parties
- SURJAN SINGH (PETITIONER)
- VISHAL JAIN & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (5)
- NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU versus KASHIF (2024)
- BAIL APPLN./3350/2023 of GOPAL DANGI Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI (2024)
- 2023 INSC 549 (2023) CONSIDERED
Statutes cited (5)
- code of criminal procedure, 439 (1973)
- constitution of india, article-21 (1950)
- code of criminal procedure (1973)
- indian penal code (1860)
- constitution of india (1950)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RC.REV. 157/2024& CM APPL. 33117/2024
SURJAN SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person
versus
VISHAL JAIN & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Anupam Gupta, Mr. Amul and
Mr. Rajneesh, Advocates along with the respondents in person the respondents in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
26.07.2024
1.The present revision petition is filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) to impugn the order dated 17.11.2023 passed by the court of Sh. Pranav Joshi, CCJ-cum-ARC, (Central), Tis Hazari Courts Delhi in eviction case bearing RC ARC no. 22/2020 titled as Vishal Jain & Ors V Surjan Singh.
2.The respondents filed an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) read with section 25(B) of the Act in petition bearing RC ARC no. 22/2020 titled as Vishal Jain & Ors V Surjan Singh in respect of one room measuring 11ft x 9ft, bearing Municipal no. 8644, Arakarshan Road, Paharganj, Delhi-110055 which was originally let out to Ram Lal/the predecessor interest of the respondent, for residential purpose.
3.The petitionerafter service of summons as per the Third Schedule of the Act, filed an application for leave to defend along with affidavit which was ordered to be dismissed vide impugned order dated 17.11.2023. The petitioner being aggrieved, filed the present petition.
4.The counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner has raised many trivial issues before the trial court as there is no landlord and tenant relationship and the respondents are also not the owner of the suit property. The said arguments are opposed by the counsel for the respondents.
5.However, the perusal of the impugned order dated 17.11.2023 reflects that the trial court has considered all the relevant issues as raised by the parties and passed reasoned order. There is no ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 17.11.2023.
6.The counsel for the petitioner after taking instructions from the petitioner, stated that the petitioner be granted time till 31.03.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises with the condition that petitioner shall not sublet/assign or part with the possession of tenanted premises or any part thereof and shall not carry out any material addition, alteration in the tenanted premises. The petitioner shall also continue to pay the agreed rent commencing from July, 2024 till the time the petitioner vacates the tenanted premises on or before on the last day of each English calendar month. The petitioner has also undertaken clear all the electricity and water charges before vacating the tenanted premises.
7.Mr. Anupam Gupta, Advocate for the respondent on instructions, stated that the respondent does not have any objection if the petitioner is granted time upto 31.03.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises subject to the conditions as mentioned hereinabove. The respondent shall not initiate execution proceedings in pursuance of eviction order dated 17.11.2023 till 31.03.2025.
8.Accordingly, the petitioner is granted time upto 31.03.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises subject to the condition that he shall not sublet, assign
or part with the possession of tenanted premises or any part thereof to any third person and shall not carry out any material addition or alteration in the tenanted premises and the petitioner is further directed to pay the agreed rent till he vacates the tenanted premises on or before the last day of each English calendar month and is also directed to clear water and electricity charges to concerned authority before vacating the tenanted premises. It is also made clear that if the petitioner fails to vacate the tenanted premises till 31.03.2025, in that eventuality, the respondent shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate legal proceedings including execution proceedings for vacation of the tenanted premises.
9.The petitioner is also directed to file an undertaking in the form of an affidavit to the said effect before this court within period of 02 weeks. 10.The present petition, along with pending application, stands disposed of.
JULY 26, 2024 Sk/abk
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J