CRL.M.C./2316/2022 of MR. ROHIT JOSHI Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-03-21
Case number: 2316/2022

Parties

Mr.N.Hariharan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Pritam Bishwas, Mr.Hitesh Kumar, Ms.Punya Rekha, Mr.D.S.Khatana, Advs (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Conclusion

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2316/2022 & CRL.M.A. 9797/2022, 9112/2024 MR. ROHIT JOSHI ..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr.N.Hariharan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Pritam Bishwas, Mr.Hitesh Kumar, Ms.Punya Rekha, Mr.D.S.Khatana, Advs.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Lalit Kumar, PS Sadar Bazar Mr.Namit Saxena, Mr.N.Khan, Mr.Shivam Raghuwanshi, Advs. for the complainant.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R21.03.2024

1.The learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, prays for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all grounds afresh in separate petition, if so advised. 2.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

3.The pending applications are disposed of as being rendered infructuous. infructuous.

MARCH 21, 2024 RN/AS

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

Click here to check corrigendum, if any