BAIL APPLN./442/2024 of BAHADUR KHAN Vs THE STATE

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-04-10
Case number: 324 of 2023

Parties

BAHADUR KHAN (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Statutes cited (1)

indian penal code (1860)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 442/2024

BAHADUR KHAN

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Anees Ahamad, Mr. Raj Kumar and Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advs. and Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advs.

versus

THE STATE ..... Respondent

Through: Mr.Raj Kumar, APP for State with SI Akshay PS Shaheen Bagh Akshay PS Shaheen Bagh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R R10.04.2024

1.The present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.324/2023 under Sections 323/341/308/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Shaheen Bagh.

2.The case of the prosecution is that when the complainant Md. Daoud

Waseem was sprinkling water outside his house then co-accused Saleem Khan, who is son of the present petitioner started arguing with the complainant over the same. Later on co-accused Saleem along with present petitioner and other persons started beating the staff of the complainant’s office. This led to the registration of the aforesaid FIR.

While issuing notice vide order dated 06.02.2024, this Court had

directed that no coercive action be taken against the present petitioner

subject to his joining investigation as and when required by the I.O. concerned.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation, which position is not disputed by the learned APP, on instructions from the IO, who is present in Court.

5.Considering the above circumstances, as well as, the fact that the injuries suffered by the complainant / victim were simple in nature, it is directed that in the event of petitioner’s arrest, he be released on bail subject to his furnishing Personal Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- and Surety Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer /Arresting Officer, further subject to the condition that he will join investigation as and when directed by the IO concerned.

6.The petition stands disposed of.

7.Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

8.Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

APRIL 10, 2024N.S. ASWAL

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J