CRL.M.C./4101/2022 of SH. RUPINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE & ANR.
Parties
- + CRL.M.C. 4101/2022 & CRL.M.As. 16923/2022, 17595/2022 SH. RUPINDER SINGH (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4101/2022 & CRL.M.As. 16923/2022, 17595/2022 SH. RUPINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sahil Jain, proxy counsel for Mr.Dipit Sareen, Adv. SH. RUPINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sahil Jain, proxy counsel for Mr.Dipit Sareen, Adv.
versus
THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Jyoti. Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Jyoti.
Mr.Pradeep Kr. Gupta, complainant in person. complainant in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R
% 07.02.2024
1.The learned APP for the State, on instructions from the IO, points out that the petitioner has been acquitted vide judgment dated 23.12.2023.
2.The learned proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not have any instructions from the petitioner in this regard.
3.In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed having been rendered infructuous, with liberty to the petitioner to get the same revived in case the need so arises. The pending applications also stand disposed of.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024/Arya/AS
Click here to check corrigendum, if any