CRL.M.C./5079/2022 of AMIT KUMAR VERMA & ANR. Vs THE STATE, GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR.
Parties
- > picture [34 x 34] intentionally omitted <== (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE, GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 6 detected)
Statutes cited (3)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5079/2022 AMIT KUMAR VERMA & ANR.
..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Mandeep Singh Kapoor, Adv.
versus
THE STATE, GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Sandeep
Mr.Akash Tomar, Adv. for R-2. Respondent nos.2 to 5 in person.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R
20.05.2024
1.This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking quashing of FIR No.14/2017 registered at Police Station: Punjabi Bagh, West District, Delhi, under Sections 288/304A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, ‘IPC’), along with all other proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of settlement.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the deceased was the husband of the respondent no.2 and the respondent nos.3 to 5 are their children. He submits that the unfortunate accident occurred when the deceased was engaged in the work of changing
shed in the Army Unit, Shakur Basti and at that time, old cemented shed broke and he fell down on the ground. He submits that the parties have now amicably settled their inter se disputes before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, and have entered into settlement dated 02.08.2022.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners has handed over two cheques dated 21.05.2024 and dated 25.06.2024 of sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the respondent nos.2 to 5, who are personally present in Court and have been duly identified by the IO. The petitioners are also present in Court and have been duly identified by the IO and submit that the cheques on presentation will be duly honoured.
4.The respondent nos.2 to 5 reaffirm the abovementioned settlement and state that they have settled all the disputes with the petitioners out of their own free will and without any coercion. They submit that they have no objection if the present FIR is quashed.
5.I have perused the contents of the FIR and also the settlement between the parties.
6.Keeping in view the fact that the respondent nos.2 to 5 do not wish to pursue their complaint any further, as also the Settlement arrived at between the parties, I find that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing with the proceedings of the present FIR as it would create further acrimony between the parties and will be an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer.
7.Guided by the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in its
judgments in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303;
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinbhai Karmur & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017) 9 SCC 641 and State of Haryana & Ors. v. Bhajan Lal & Ors. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, this Court deems it appropriate, in the interest of justice, to exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
8.Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Binding the petitioners to the statement made hereinabove, FIR No.14/2017 registered at Police Station: Punjabi Bagh, West District, Delhi, under Sections 288/304A/34 of the IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners are quashed.
MAY 20, 2024/ns/AS
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any