BAIL APPLN./1146/2024 of PARVINDER SINGH @ PRINCE @ NAKLI Vs THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO OF PS HARI NAGAR DLEHI
Parties
- PARVINDER SINGH @ PRINCE @ NAKLI (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO OF PS HARI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (2)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1146/2024
PARVINDER SINGH @ PRINCE @ NAKLI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Omkar Sharma and Mr. Pulkit Dandona, Advs. Dandona, Advs. versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO OF PS HARI
NAGAR DLEHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with SI Gaurav Police Station Hari Nagar with SI Gaurav Police Station Hari Nagar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R R02.05.2024
1.The present application has been filed seeking interim bail on the ground that the mother of the petitioner had suffered brain stroke.
2.Vide order dated 30.04.2024 direction was given to the State to verify the medical condition of the mother of the petitioner who was stated to be still in the hospital.
3.The Investigating Officer has verified the records provided by the learned counsel for the petitioner. From the verification report it is borne out that the mother of the petitioner was admitted in Chawla Surgical & Medical Centre on 21.04.2024 and thereafter she was discharged on 28.04.2024.
4.The report obtained from the Chawla Surgical & Medical Centre also reveals that at the time of discharge the status of the patient was stable and
the fits were under control.
5.Needless to say that the present interim protection was granted by this Court premised on the submission made by the learned counsel that co-ordinate bench of this Court had granted similar protection to him in respect of case registered vide FIR No. 531/2018. However, subsequently the application seeking extension of interim bail in the said case was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
6.In view of the above, there is no ground to extend the interim bail any further. The application seeking extension is dismissed.
7.The petitioner is directed to surrender before the Jail Superintendent without any delay.
MAY 2, 2024N.S. ASWAL
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J