CRL.M.C./5385/2023 of ROHIT PANDEY Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Parties
- ROHIT PANDEY (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5385/2023, CRL.M.A. 20415/2023
ROHIT PANDEY
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Ms. Surbhi Khanna and Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIO R R
29.04.2024
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise all such contentions which may be available at the time of framing of charge.
2. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith miscellaneous application.
APRIL 29, 2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J