NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/596/2022 of DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) (KINGSWAY CAMP) Vs NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2024-07-30
Case number
596/2022

Parties

Cites (2 resolved of 7 detected)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~55, 57, 59, 68, 75, 80, 85

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 596/2022, CM APPL. 1684/2022 DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD)

(KINGSWAY CAMP) .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs. Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

& ORS. .....Respondent

Through: Mr Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates for MCD. Makhija, Advocates for MCD.

+ W.P.(C) 629/2022, CM APPL. 1799/2022

DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) (VASUNDHARA ENCLAVE) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs. (VASUNDHARA ENCLAVE) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondent

Through:

+ W.P.(C) 639/2022, CM APPL. 1835/2022

DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) (ROHINI) .....Petitioner (ROHINI) .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms.

Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates for MCD.

68 + W.P.(C) 6072/2022, CM APPL. 18252/2022 DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) (RAJOURI GARDEN) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates for MCD.

75 + W.P.(C) 8941/2022, CM APPL. 26868/2022

DOMINOS PIZZA ( JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) (UNITY ONE MALL-JANAKPURI) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

& ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates for MCD.

+ W.P.(C) 11065/2022, CM APPL. 32430/2022

DIGHENT (A UNIT OF JDGHENT KRII PVT LTD) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

NDMC AND ORS .....Respondent Through:

+ W.P.(C) 3157/2023, CM APPL. 12193/2023

DOMINOS PIZZA (JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD) (PARAS CINEMA, NEHRU PLACE) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.

versus

MCD AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates for MCD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R R30.07.2024

1.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on account of subsequent development, he wishes to withdraw these petitions. of subsequent development, he wishes to withdraw these petitions.

2.The petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

JULY 30, 2024/KG

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J