W.P.(C)/6131/2019 of M/S ROOP CATERERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-08-12
Case number: 6131/2019

Parties

Ali, Mr. Pushpendra Bhadoria, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Advs (PETITIONER)
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

W.P.(C)/3844/2021 of RASHI PERIPHERALS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS (2021)

Statutes cited (1)

limitation act (1963)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~81-84

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6131/2019, CM APPL. 26403/2019 M/S ROOP CATERERS .....Petitioner M/S ROOP CATERERS .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Jasmeet Singh,

Mr. Mahinder Singh Hura, Mr. Saif

Ali, Mr. Pushpendra Bhadoria, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocate for R-2. 2.

+ W.P.(C) 6212/2019, CM APPL. 26670/2019

M/S SATYAM CATERERS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Jasmeet Singh,

Mr. Mahinder Singh Hura, Mr. Saif Ali, Mr. Pushpendra Bhadoria, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Advs. Ali, Mr. Pushpendra Bhadoria, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocate for R-2. 2.

+ W.P.(C) 6273/2019, CM APPL. 26828/2019

M/S BRANDAVAN FOOD PRODUCTS .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Jasmeet Singh,

Mr. Mahinder Singh Hura, Mr. Saif

Ali, Mr. Pushpendra Bhadoria, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocate for R-2.

84 + W.P.(C) 6312/2019, CM APPL. 26934/2019

R K ASSOCIATES AND HOTELIERS PVT. LTD.

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Mahinder Singh Hura, Mr. Saif Ali, Mr. Pushpendra Bhadoria, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Pranav Menon, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Vedansh Anand, Adv.

CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R R12.08.2024

1.Learned counsel who appears for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petitions with further liberty to take an appropriate recourse in accordance with the law. With the aforesaid liberty, the instant petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn.

2.All rights and contentions are left open.

3.Needless to state that if the petitioner takes up any legal remedy in accordance with the law, the same shall not be mechanically dismissed only on the ground of delay. The petitioners appear to be bonafidely prosecuting the instant proceedings before this Court. All those aspects shall be considered in the context of the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963.

AUGUST 12, 2024/KG

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J