W.P.(C)/6507/2024 of CYFUTURE INDIA PVT. LTD. Vs EESL (ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED) AND ORS.
Parties
- CYFUTURE INDIA PVT. LTD (PETITIONER)
- EESL (ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED) AND ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 4 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6507/2024 & CM APPL. 28186/2024
CYFUTURE INDIA PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pankaj Bhagat, Advocate.
versus
EESL (ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED) AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Jain, Mr. Vaibhav Choudhary, Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocates for Choudhary, Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocates for
Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Aakash Pathak, GP for R-2. Aakash Pathak, GP for R-2.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R R13.05.2024
1.The Petitioner has approached this Court primarily challenging the Debarment Order dated 17.01.2024 whereby the Petitioner had been debarred for period of one year from participating in any tender of Respondent No.1, i.e., Energy Efficiency Services Limited (EESL).
2.Material on record indicates that pursuant to the Debarment Order, the
Petitioner gave representation and the representation was finally considered, and by Communication dated 08.04.2024, the Petitioner was informed that the period of debarment has been reduced from one year to three months, i.e. from 17.01.2024 to 16.04.2024. The period of debarment was over on 16.04.2024.
3.Though the period of debarment is already over on 16.04.2024 yet the Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the Debarment Order on the ground that the Debarment Order has been passed in violation of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gorkha Security Services v. Government (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.,(2014) 9 SCC 105 and UMC Technologies Private
Limited v. Food Corporation of India & Anr.,2021 (2) SCC 551.
4.Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 very fairly states that no Show Cause Notice was given to the Petitioner prior to the Order of Debarment.
5.In view of the fact that no Show Cause Notice has been given to the Petitioner, the Impugned Debarment Order dated 17.01.2024 is set aside.
6.However, it is always open for the Respondents to issue fresh Show Cause Notice to the Petitioner intimating the Petitioner of the possibility of Debarment and proceed further in accordance with the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gorkha Security (supra).
7.In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any.
MAY 13, 2024S. Zakir
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J