W.P.(CRL)/763/2024 of MR. VIJAY Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Parties
- + W.P.(CRL) 763/2024 MR. VIJAY (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)
- WRIT PETITION 732 of 2016 (2025)
Statutes cited (3)
- code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
- constitution of india, 482 (1950)
- code of criminal procedure (1973)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 763/2024 MR. VIJAY ..... Petitioner MR. VIJAY ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.C.M.Grover, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Peswani, Adv. for Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) for State. Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) for State.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R R% 05.03.2024CRL.M.A. 7126/2024(exemption)CRL.M.A. 7126/2024(exemption)
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 763/2024
2.This petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking directions for speedy and expeditious disposal/trial in the complaint case, being CC 26258/2018, titled Laxmi v. Vijay Sahani, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and pending adjudication before the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-04 (Mahila Court), South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’). Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking directions for speedy and expeditious disposal/trial in the complaint case, being CC 26258/2018, titled Laxmi v. Vijay Sahani, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and pending adjudication before the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-04 (Mahila Court), South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’).
3.There is no reason for this Court to come to the conclusion that the learned Trial Court is not making all the endeavours to
expedite the trial. However, in spite of the same, request is made to the learned Trial Court, not to grant any unwarranted adjournments to either of the parties and make an endeavour to adjudicate on the above complaint case as expeditiously as possible.
4.The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
MARCH 5, 2024 RN/AS
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any