BAIL APPLN./1861/2023 of ZAMIL Vs STATE OF DELHI
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 1861/2023 ZAMIL (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1861/2023 ZAMIL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Omkar Sharma, Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma & Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advs. ZAMIL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Omkar Sharma, Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma & Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advs.
versus
STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State SI Sonia, PS- Bharat Nagar Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik (DHCLSC), Mr. Naveen Sarswat & Mr. Rony John, Advs. with brother of complainant/victim Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State SI Sonia, PS- Bharat Nagar Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik (DHCLSC), Mr. Naveen Sarswat & Mr. Rony John, Advs. with brother of complainant/victim
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R R11.03.2024
1.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, at the outset, submits that the examination of the prosecution witnesses is already completed. He submits that the matter is now listed for defence evidence and he is hopeful that the matter would be concluded within period of six months.
2.The learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the present bail application and approach this Court if the trial is not concluded within period of six months.
3.The bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
MARCH 11, 2024 “SS”
AMIT MAHAJAN, J