BAIL APPLN./2293/2023 of HIMANSHU Vs THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)
Parties
- BAIL APPLN./2293/2023 of HIMANSHU (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2293/2023HIMANSHU ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Adv. versus
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for the State SI Ranjana, PS- Subzi Mandi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANO R R05.02.2024
1.The learned counsel for the applicant submits that, despite directions of this Court, the victim has not been examined before the learned Trial Court.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that, on 01.02.2024, the learned Presiding Officer was on leave, even though the victim was produced for examination.
3.He submits that the matter is now fixed for examination of the victim on 26.03.2024.
4.The learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the present application with liberty to file afresh after examinatin of the eye witnesses.
5.The application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 5, 2024 “SS”