BAIL APPLN./310/2023 of SH. HIMANSHU Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR.
Parties
- > picture [34 x 35] intentionally omitted <== (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 310/2023 SH. HIMANSHU ..... Applicant
..... Applicant Through: Mr.Mohit Sharma and Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with W/SI Ratan Bai W/SI Ratan Bai
Mr.Harshit Jain, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Mr.Shraib Ansari and Mr.Shubham Singh, Advs. along with victim in person. (DHCLSC) with Mr.Shraib Ansari and Mr.Shubham Singh, Advs. along with victim in person.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R28.02.2024
1.The learned APP points out that the Applicant has been arrested.
2.In view thereof, the present application has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of. However, all rights of the Applicant shall remain open.
FEBRUARY 28, 2024/ns
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any