W.P.(CRL)/1654/2024 of L S POWER CONTROL PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Parties
- + W.P.(CRL) 1654/2024 L S POWER CONTROL PRIVATE LIMITED (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (3)
- code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
- constitution of india, 482 (1950)
- constitution of india, article-226 (1950)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1654/2024 L S POWER CONTROL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner L S POWER CONTROL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sunil Dalal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pradeep Singh, Ms.Manisha, Mr.Nikhil Beniwal, Mr.Navish Bhati, Advs. Mr.Pradeep Singh, Ms.Manisha, Mr.Nikhil Beniwal, Mr.Navish Bhati, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Through:
..... Respondents Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, CGSC, Mr.Abhijeet Kumar, Mr.Sagar Mehlawat, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Atul Tripathi, SCC, Mr.V.K. Attri, Adv for R-2. Mr.Abhijeet Kumar, Mr.Sagar Mehlawat, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Atul Tripathi, SCC, Mr.V.K. Attri, Adv for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R% 22.05.2024
CRL.M.A. 16124/2024 (Exemption)
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 1654/2024 & CRL.M.A. 16123/2024
2.This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for direction to the respondent no.2 to not take any coercive action against the petitioner in relation to the summons dated 03.04.2024 and without issuing any appropriate Show Cause Notice under Section 73/74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
3.The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that certain documents have already been supplied to the respondents in answer to the summons, and states that the petitioner further undertakes to co-operate in the inquiry conducted by the respondents.
4.The learned counsel for the respondent no.2, who appears on advance notice, submits that the apprehension expressed by the petitioner in the present petition is completely unfounded. He submits that presently no coercive action is contemplated to be taken against the petitioner, and if at all, any action would be taken, the same shall be taken in accordance with law.
5.In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2, no further direction is required to be passed in the present petition.
6.The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
MAY 22, 2024/Arya/am
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any