W.P.(CRL)/3876/2024 of RAJINDER SINGH & ANR. Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-12-12
Bench: CUSTOM THEREAFTER

Parties

+ W.P.(CRL)-3876/2024 & CRL.M.A 37428/2024, CRL.M.A.37429/2024 RAJINDER SINGH & ANR (PETITIONER)
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CM(M)/1180/2017 of GURCHARAN LAL TANEJA Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL)-3876/2024 & CRL.M.A 37428/2024,CRL.M.A.37429/2024RAJINDER SINGH & ANR.CRL.M.A.37429/2024RAJINDER SINGH & ANR.

.....Petitioner

Through:Mr. Vijay Dutt Gahtori, Ms. SakshiMehra, Mr. Latesh Chauhan, Ms.Aruna Negi Chauhan, Advs.Mehra, Mr. Latesh Chauhan, Ms.Aruna Negi Chauhan, Advs.

versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS,

.....Respondent

Through:Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC withMr. Alok Sharma, Adv.SI Ashwini Kr., PS Rajouri Garden

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHO R R%12.12.2024

1.The matter has been received on transfer.

2.This is petition seeking direction to respondent No. 1 to provideprotection to the petitioners against respondent Nos. 2 to 4 who areharassing, threatening and forcing petitioner No. 2 to return home.

3.The petitioners are in love with each other and on 09.08.2024, theygot married to each other as per Hindu Rights and custom. Thereafter, thepetitioner No. 2 voluntarily left her parents’ home to live with petitioner No.

4.Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 who are the family members of petitioner No.2 have threatened the petitioners and have also lodged missing report with

the police station.

5.The petitioners are present through video conference mode and areidentified by their counsel, Mr. Vijay Dutt Gahtori and SI Ashwini Kr., PSRajouri Garden.

6.The certificate of marriage is already on record and as per the same,both the petitioners are adults and have married each other as per their ownfree will and desire. Respondent No. 1 is under an obligation to ensurepersonal safety and security of the petitioners and Mr. Sharma, learnedcounsel for and on behalf of respondent No. 1 undertakes that the same willbe done.

7.The mobile number of the SHO as well as the Beat Officer has beenshared with the counsel for the petitioner and as and when complaint/callis received from either of the petitioner, the same shall be duly addressedand appropriate action shall be taken.

8.Since the prayers in the present petition are primarily againstrespondent No. 1, I am not inclined to issue notice to respondents Nos. 2 to

9.The petition is allowed and disposed of along with pendingapplications, if any.

DECEMBER 12, 2024/sp

JASMEET SINGH, J

Click here to check corrigendum, if any