BAIL APPLN./1630/2024 of RAJA SINGH Vs STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANOTHER
Parties
- $~15 and 19 (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANOTHER (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~15 and 19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1630/2024 RAJA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarunjeet Singh Jolly, Mr. Narendra Kumar Sharma, Dr. Kuldeep Ahuja, Ms. Prachi Bajpai, Mr. Ahwin Bhargav, Advs. RAJA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarunjeet Singh Jolly, Mr. Narendra Kumar Sharma, Dr. Kuldeep Ahuja, Ms. Prachi Bajpai, Mr. Ahwin Bhargav, Advs. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Vishnupriya Pandey, Mr. Dhankishore Rai, Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advs. with SI Shweta, PS Tilak Nagar. Ms. Swati Arora, Mr. Lalit Rana, Advs. for R-2 Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Vishnupriya Pandey, Mr. Dhankishore Rai, Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advs. with SI Shweta, PS Tilak Nagar. Ms. Swati Arora, Mr. Lalit Rana, Advs. for R-2
+ BAIL APPLN. 1790/2024 BAHADUR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarunjeet Singh Jolly, Mr. Narendra Kumar Sharma, Dr. Kuldeep Ahuja, Ms. Prachi Bajpai, Mr. Ahwin Bhargav, Advs. BAHADUR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarunjeet Singh Jolly, Mr. Narendra Kumar Sharma, Dr. Kuldeep Ahuja, Ms. Prachi Bajpai, Mr. Ahwin Bhargav, Advs.
versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Vishnupriya Pandey, Mr. Dhankishore Rai, Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advs. with SI Shweta, PS Tilak Nagar. Ms. Swati Arora, Mr. Lalit Rana, Advs. for R-2 Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Vishnupriya Pandey, Mr. Dhankishore Rai, Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advs. with SI Shweta, PS Tilak Nagar. Ms. Swati Arora, Mr. Lalit Rana, Advs. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R R09.07.2024
At the outset, learned APP for the State submits that the charge sheet in the present case has already been filed without the arrest of the petitioner. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw both the petitions with liberty to file regular bail applications before the learned Trial Court.
Liberty is granted.
Learned Trial Court shall decide the same in accordance with the law. In view of the above, both the petitions stand disposed of.
JULY 9, 2024Pallavi
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J