W.P.(CRL)/601/2024 of MS NANSY GAUR AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE AND OTHERS

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-02-20

Parties

MS NANSY GAUR AND ANOTHER (PETITIONER)
THE STATE AND OTHERS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Statutes cited (3)

code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
constitution of india, 482 (1950)
constitution of india, article-226 (1950)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 601/2024

MS NANSY GAUR AND ANOTHER

..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ritik Sharma, Mr.Himanshu Aulluck, Advs.

versus

THE STATE AND OTHERS

..... Respondents Mr.Amit Peswani, Adv. for Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) with Insp. Rajiv Kumar, SI Vinod Kumar

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R% 20.02.2024

CRL.M.A. 5503/2024 (Exemption)

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(CRL) 601/2024

2.This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking issuance of direction to the respondent nos.1 and 2 to provide necessary police protection/security to the life of the petitioners against the threats to life allegedly received from the family members of the petitioner no.1, who are arrayed as respondent nos. 3 to 5.

3.Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners got married against the wishes of the respondent nos.3 to 5 on 12.02.2024 in an Arya Samaj Temple, and have started living together

thereafter. After the factum of the petitioners being married was discovered by the respondent nos. 3 to 5, they became very aggressive and extended threats to the petitioners of dire consequences of the same.

4.Issue notice.

5.Notice is accepted by Mr.Amit Peswani, Advocate on behalf of Ms.Nandita Rao, the learned ASC (Crl.) for the respondent nos.1 and 2.

6.Without entering into the veracity of the allegations made in the petition, it is directed that the petitioners shall approach the Station House Officer (SHO) of the concerned Police Station and the SHO shall share with the petitioners his phone number as also that of the Beat Constable.

7.In case the petitioners perceive any threat, the petitioners may contact either of them for seeking protection. The concerned SHO/ Beat Constable shall immediately look into the grievance of the petitioners and take necessary action.

8.The petition is disposed of with the above directions.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

FEBRUARY 20, 2024/Arya/am

Click here to check corrigendum, if any