BAIL APPLN./3535/2023 of FARUK KHAN Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- FARUK KHAN (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3535/2023
FARUK KHAN
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Narender Kumar, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State SI Ram Kumar Crime Branch Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi State SI Ram Kumar Crime Branch Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi
Ms. Azra Rehman, Ms. Jyoti Kumar and Mr. Syed Shakeel Husain, Advs. for complainant and Mr. Syed Shakeel Husain, Advs. for complainant
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
29.01.2024
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FSL report has
not been filed and the matter is at the stage of arguments on charge and is listed on 09.04.2024 before the learned Trial Court.
2.On the other hand, the learned APP for the State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, states that the FSL report has been filed and the arguments are likely to take place on the next date of hearing fixed before the learned Trial Court.
3.arguments on the question of framing of charges.
The learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of
4.In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court for the bail at an appropriate stage. withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court for the bail at an appropriate stage.
5.The application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
JANUARY 29, 2024N.S. ASWAL
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J