CRL.REV.P./503/2016 of RADHA RANI Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

$~31& 32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 503/2016& CRL.M.A. 11800/2016 RADHA RANI .....Petitioner RADHA RANI .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Siddharth Gill and Mr. Smit Singh Kuru, Advs. Singh Kuru, Advs.

versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents

Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Lalit Kumar, PS Bindapur. State with SI Lalit Kumar, PS Bindapur.

Mr. Gulab Singh, Mr. Nikhil Sikka,

Ms. Muskaan Arora, Ms. Aanchal and Mr. Shekhar Beriwal, Advs. for R-2 to 4. Mr. Shekhar Beriwal, Advs. for R-2 to 4.

+ CRL.REV.P. 504/2016&CRL.M.A. 11803/2016 RADHA RANI .....Petitioner RADHA RANI .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Siddharth Gill and Mr. Smit Singh Kuru, Advs. Singh Kuru, Advs.

versus

STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents

Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Lalit Kumar, PS Bindapur. State with SI Lalit Kumar, PS Bindapur.

Mr. Gulab Singh, Mr. Nikhil Sikka,

Ms. Muskaan Arora, Ms. Aanchal and Mr. Shekhar Beriwal, Advs. for R-2 to 4. Mr. Shekhar Beriwal, Advs. for R-2 to 4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

11.07.2024

1.Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw these petitions and file in

the form of an appeal under the SC/ST Act.

2.Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

3.Liberty is granted.

4.Counsel for the petitioner states that this was inadvertently filed as revision and he has sought the indulgence of this Court to treat like an appeal but there is serious objection on behalf of the respondents. revision and he has sought the indulgence of this Court to treat like an appeal but there is serious objection on behalf of the respondents.

5.Taking into account the pendency of the matter, the limitation for filing appeal shall be considered accordingly when the appeal is filed. appeal shall be considered accordingly when the appeal is filed.

6.Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

ANISH DAYAL, J

JULY 11, 2024/MK