CRL.M.C./1142/2025 of VIPUL AGGARWAL & ORS. Vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
Parties
- VIPUL AGGARWAL & ORS (PETITIONER)
- STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
Signature Not Verified
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 02.09.2025
+ CRL.M.C. 1142/2025
VIPUL AGGARWAL & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Vani Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with IO/SI Joginder.
Mr. Sanjay Dahiya and Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U M N T (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 1070/2023 of PS Wazirabad for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.
2. Respondent no.2 present (through videoconferencing) with her counsel in court and is identified by the IO/SI Joginder.
3. As reflected from previous record, detailed statements of parties have
Page 1 of 2 pages
CRL.M.C.1142/2025
Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,
GIRISH KATHPALIA
2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,
Signature Not Verified
already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. State has no objection to this petition.
4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. It is further stated by her that towards full and final settlement of all her claims including stridhan and alimony, she has received sum of Rs.23,50,000/- from petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 already stands dissolved by decree of divorce dated 27.11.2024, and no child was born out of their wedlock. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of petitioners.
5. Having spoken with the parties, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push them through trial. Therefore, the petition is allowed and accordingly FIR No. 1070/2023 of PS Wazirabad for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4GIRISH 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155KATHPALIA70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.02 17:04:12 -07'00'
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)
SEPTEMBER 02, 2025/ry
Page 2 of 2 pages
CRL.M.C.1142/2025