NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/12569/2025 of SAVE INDIA FOUNDATION (REGD.) Vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2025-08-20
Case number
12569/2025

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 12569/2025, CM APPL. 51226/2025 & CM APPL. 51227/2025

SAVE INDIA FOUNDATION (REGD.) .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Umesh Chand Sharma and Mr. M. K. Gaur, Mr. Yogesh Aggarwal, Ms. K. Khatri, Mr. Peeyush Kaushik, Mr. Aakash Khatri, Mr. R. Rajput, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Mr. Mohit Singh, Advs.. M. K. Gaur, Mr. Yogesh Aggarwal, Ms. K. Khatri, Mr. Peeyush Kaushik, Mr. Aakash Khatri, Mr. R. Rajput, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Mr. Mohit Singh, Advs..

versus

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, SC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Adv. for GNCTD Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, SC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Adv. for GNCTD

Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Amit Kr. Rana, Adv. for Delhi Police Ms. Shobhana Takiar, SC for DDA/R-4 and 6 with Mr. Amit Kr. Rana, Adv. for Delhi Police Ms. Shobhana Takiar, SC for DDA/R-4 and 6

Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi and Ms. Shivani Thakur, Advs. for DUSIB Thakur, Advs. for DUSIB

Mr. Manuchaturvedi, SC for MCD

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R R% 20.08.2025

1.Heard learned counsel representing the parties.

2.For redressal of the grievances raised in the writ petition, the

petitioner has already represented the authorities on 27.05.2025 by the

representation, which is enclosed as Annexure P-1 in the writ petition.

3.Having regard to the facts that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has already represented the authority concerned, we dispose of this writ petition that the representation made by the petitioner shall be considered and taken to its logical end, of course after appropriately issued notice to the party who is likely to be affected, if any action on the said representations is facilitated.

Having regard to the facts that for redressal of his grievances, the

4.applications stand disposed of.

The present Public Interest Litigation petition along with pending

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

AUGUST 20, 2025/j

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J