W.P.(C)/13916/2025 of LAKSHYA SHARMA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2025-09-10
Case number: 13916/2025

Parties

LAKSHYA SHARMA (PETITIONER)
UNION OF INDIA & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

W.P.(C)/3844/2021 of RASHI PERIPHERALS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS (2021)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 13916/2025, CM APPL. 56974/2025 & CM APPL. 56975/2025

LAKSHYA SHARMA

.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Mr. Rishabh Mishra, Mr. Ankur Gupta, Ms. KM Madhu, Ms. Manishita Bhattacharjee, Mr. Mridul Dhingra and Ms. Sapna Rai, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Central Govt. Standing Counsel with Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

% 10.09.2025

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1.The petitioner challenges his transfer to Kolkata on the ground that his wife is suffering from brain tumour.

2.The representation filed by the petitioner on 3 September 2025 is still pending decision.

3.In the circumstances, we dispose of this writ petition with direction to the respondents to treat the present writ petition as representation and take decision thereon within period of four

Signature Not Verified

weeks from today.

4.The decision as and when taken would be communicated forthwith to the petitioner. In order to enable the petitioner to avail legal remedies in case the decision is adverse to the petitioner, the operation of the decision, if adverse, shall remain stayed for period of one week from the date it is taken.

5.The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

6.Dasti under signature of the Court Master.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 dsn

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

Signature Not Verified