CONT.CAS(C)/830/2025 of AVINASH MADHAVA MURTHY Vs VINEETA RAO
Parties
- Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Advocate (PETITIONER)
- VINEETA RAO (RESPONDENT)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI
+ CONT.CAS(C) 830/2025
AVINASH MADHAVA MURTHY
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Advocate.
versus
VINEETA RAO
Through:
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R R26.05.2025
[Hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing]
1.This petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the settlement deed dated 09[th] February 2023 with the facilitation of the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Saket. settlement deed dated 09[th] February 2023 with the facilitation of the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Saket.
2.As per settlement, respondent had agreed to support the petition for quashing of FIR No. 16/2022 registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi under Sections 498A/406/323/34 IPC. quashing of FIR No. 16/2022 registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi under Sections 498A/406/323/34 IPC.
3.Counsel for petitioner states that he has received an affidavit of no objection, on the second day after this petition was filed. objection, on the second day after this petition was filed.
4.Accordingly, petitioner does not wish to press this petition. Petition is disposed of in view of the above observations. disposed of in view of the above observations.
5.Counsel for petitioner states that since respondent has not been
complying despite settlement, they have incurred various litigations costs, as the petitioner is in Mumbai.
6.Needles to state, the petitioner is at liberty to agitate before competent court for grant of costs. court for grant of costs.
7.Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.
ANISH DAYAL, J
MAY 26, 2025/RK/tk