WRIT PETITION 2261/2025

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 1999-04-15
Bench: ARUNACHAL PRADESH, CHURACHANDPUR, CRPF, KHONSA, MANIPUR
Case number: 2261/2025

Parties

+ W.P.(C) 2261/2025 INSP PH AMARPAL SINGH (PETITIONER)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1 resolved of 3 detected)

W.P.(C)/3844/2021 of RASHI PERIPHERALS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS (2021)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2261/2025 INSP PH AMARPAL SINGH .....Petitioner INSP PH AMARPAL SINGH .....Petitioner

Through: Mr.Abhay Kr. Bhargava, Mr.Satyarth Sinha, Ms.Khushi, Advs. Mr.Satyarth Sinha, Ms.Khushi, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr.Abhishek Yadav, SPC, Mr.Rajat Sikri, GP, Ms.Seema Roni, Adv. with Mr.Ajay Pal, Law Officers and HCR.K. Singh (CRPF)

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAURO R R21.02.2025

1.This petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for the grant of Special Duty Allowances to the petitioner for the service rendered at 124 BN, CRPF, Khonsa, Arunachal Pradesh, from 15.04.1999 to 09.04.2002, and at 28 BN CRPF, Churachandpur, Manipur, from 06.01.2003 to 14.03.2005, alongwith the arrears with the interest at the rate of 6% P.A.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of the claim of the petitioner, places reliance on the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Director General CRPF vs Janardan Singh, (2018) 7 SCC 656. 3.Issue notice. the petitioner, places reliance on the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Director General CRPF vs Janardan Singh, (2018) 7 SCC 656. 3.Issue notice.

4.Notice is accepted by Mr.Abhishek Yadav, the learned counsel for the respondents.

5.Keeping in view the averments made in the petition, we are of the opinion that the respondents should treat the present petition as representation of the petitioner and decide on the same within period of eight weeks from today, communicating reasoned order to the petitioner. In case the petitioner is held entitled to the reliefs as claimed, the same should be released to the petitioner within further two weeks thereafter. In case the claim of the petitioner is rejected, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

6.The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

SHALINDER KAUR, J

FEBRUARY 21, 2025/AryaClick here to check corrigendum, if any