W.P.(CRL)/241/2025 of TABREZ AHMED Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Parties
- + W.P.(CRL) 241/2025, CRL.M.A. 2066/2025 TABREZ AHMED (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (2)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 241/2025, CRL.M.A. 2066/2025 TABREZ AHMED
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Summinder Paswan, Adv. Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate. Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State. SI Sandeep Kumar, Spl. Cell/NDR State. SI Sandeep Kumar, Spl. Cell/NDR
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R R23.01.2025
By way of the present petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks direction for expeditious disposal of the trial in case FIR No. 230/2019 dated 19.12.2019 registered under sections 489A/489B/489C/489D/ 489E/120B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at P.S.: Special Cell, Delhi.
The record shows that the subject FIR was registered on 19.12.2019;
the petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody from 20.12.2019; and that charges in the matter were framed vide order dated 24.02.2023 passed by the learned trial court.
W.P.(CRL) 241/2025 Page 1 of 2
3.A perusal of order-sheets of the learned trial court shows that out of the 38 prosecution witnesses cited in the chargesheet, 15 witnesses already stand examined. the 38 prosecution witnesses cited in the chargesheet, 15 witnesses already stand examined.
4.The offence under section 489A IPC is punishable with imprisonment up to life. up to life.
5.In the circumstances, no ground is made out for directing the learned trial court to expedite trial in the subject FIR. trial court to expedite trial in the subject FIR.
6.The petition is accordingly dismissed.
7.Needless to add that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file for other appropriate relief, as may be permissible, in accordance with law. appropriate relief, as may be permissible, in accordance with law.
JANUARY 23, 2025/tp
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
W.P.(CRL) 241/2025 Page 2 of 2