CRL.M.C./2742/2025 of TUFAIL KHAN Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2025-04-24
Case number: 2742/2025

Parties

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv (PETITIONER)
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

BAIL APPLN./1697/2020 of SHAHJADA IRFAN Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI (2020)

Statutes cited (1)

indian penal code (1860)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2742/2025

TUFAIL KHAN .....Petitioner

Through: through V.C.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State. SI Chandraveer, PS Amar Colony.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R R% 24.04.2025CRL.M.A. 12288/2025 (exemption)

1.Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2742/2025

3.The present petition is filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 237/2020 dated 18.06.2020, registered at Police Station Amar Colony for offence under Section 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is essentially aggrieved that the investigation has not been brought to the logical conclusion and no chargesheet has been filed as yet despite the fact that the FIR was registered way back on 18.06.2020. He submits that the same is causing severe This is digitally signed order.The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.and persistent harassment and humiliation. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:46:28

5.He further submits that the petitioner has been unnecessarily harassed and implicated in the present FIR.

6.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (‘APP’) for the State, at the outset, on instructions, submits that the final report has already been prepared and is submitted to the higher authorities for scrutiny. He submits that the same is likely to be filed before the concerned Court within period of 2-3 weeks.

7.Considering that the chargesheet has already been prepared, this Court does not consider it apposite to entertain the present petition at this stage.

8.Concededly, if no evidence has been found against the petitioner, the same would be indicated by the Investigating Agency in the Final Report. However, no pre-emptive order can be passed at this stage.

9.In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy in case any grievance remains in future.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

APRIL 24, 2025