NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/383/2025 of GURUSHIDDAPPA N SHIROL Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2025-03-10
Bench
DELHI
Case number
383/2025

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 14.01.2025

+ W.P.(C) 383/2025 GURUSHIDDAPPA N SHIROL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhay Kumar Bhargava and Ms.Khushi, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Naginder Benipal, SPC for UOI with Mr.Kapil Dev Yadav, GP and Mr.Ankit Siwach, Adv. for R-1to R-3 Mr.Rajiv Kapur, SC with Mr.Akshit Kapur and Mr.Swetabh Sharma, Advs. for R-4/SBI

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1.The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following

reliefs:-

“i.Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to award the petitioner the benefits of disability cover flowing from Golden Jubilee Seema Prahari Kalyan Kawach scheme along with 12% interest from the date of Disability considered by the BSF Medical Board dated 24.02.2024. ii. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing

Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 3

the respondents to award the petitioner the benefits of disability cover flowing from Central Armed Police Salary Package account, along with 12% interest from the date of Disability considered by the BSF Medical Board dated 24.02.2024.”

2.Issue notice.

3.At the very outset, the learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, submits that the petitioner has approached this Court without making any representation to the respondents.

4.When faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the present, the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner’s claim as raised in the present petition and pass reasoned order thereon in time bound manner.

5.The learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have no objection to this limited prayer sought by the petitioner.

6.In the light of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim, as raised in the present petition, as representation of the petitioner, within period of eight weeks from today. In case, the petitioner is found eligible for any relief, the respondents will grant him the same along with all consequential benefits, within period of four weeks thereafter. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for him to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.

Signature Not Verified

7.We make it clear that we have not examined the claim of the petitioner on merits.

8.The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

JANUARY 14, 2025/sg/IK

SHALINDER KAUR, J

Click here to check corrigendum, if any