CRL.M.C./5410/2023 of KULDEEP SINGH Vs NAVEEN KUMAR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2025-01-30
Case number: 5410/2023

Parties

KULDEEP SINGH (PETITIONER)
NAVEEN KUMAR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

ITA/957/2018 of ROHIT GANDHI Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 5410/2023 & CRL.M.A. 20528/2023

KULDEEP SINGH

.....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Vikas, Advocate (through Vc).

versus

NAVEEN KUMAR

Through: None.

.....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R R28.01.2025

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the

following prayers:

“(a) To set aside the order dated 17/04/2023 passed by the Court of Sh.Anubhav Jain, Ld MM, Karakrdooma, Shahdara, Delhi in CC No. 12239/2016, dismissing application of Petitioner seeking permission to take photographs of two documents dated 09/03/2016 and 11/04/2016 for getting Report from Hand Writing Expert, Sh.Anubhav Jain, Ld MM, Karakrdooma, Shahdara, Delhi in CC No. 12239/2016, dismissing application of Petitioner seeking permission to take photographs of two documents dated 09/03/2016 and 11/04/2016 for getting Report from Hand Writing Expert,

(b) To order Ld Trial Court to consider the application of the Petitioner/accused afresh, and Petitioner/accused afresh, and

(c) Any other and further order deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of Petitioner and as against the Respondent” and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of Petitioner and as against the Respondent”

3. It is pointed out that the complaint case No. 12239/2016 has been disposed vide final judgment dated 02.08.2024 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. It is submitted that an appeal qua the judgment has been filed before the Court of competent jurisdiction.

4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as being infructuous.

5. Needless to state that the petitioner will be at liberty to move an appropriate application in accordance with law in the aforesaid appeal with regard to prayer sought in the present petition.

6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

JANUARY 28, 2025/bsr

AMIT SHARMA, J

Click here to check corrigendum, if any