NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CIVIL APPEAL 6886/2025

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2025-10-13
Bench
DELHI
Case number
6886/2025

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 6886/2025, CRL.M.A. 28931-28932/2025

ARUN SHRIVASTAVA AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. Through: Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents

Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAO R R

13.10.2025

1.Petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners for quashing of FIR No.0497/2019 under Sections 406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Farsh Bazar, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for Resopndent No.2 appear on advance Notice.

3.Learned APP submits that Charges were framed by learned JMFC on 23.01.2025 and the quashing has been sought essentially on merits of the case, for which the appropriate remedy is Revision Petition before learned Sessions Court.

4.Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum with appropriate representation.

5.Accordingly, the Petition along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdraw, with liberty as prayed for.

6.Needless to say, Petitioner is at liberty to move an Application before the Revisional Court seeking condonation of delay in filing the Revision Petition.

OCTOBER 13, 2025/R

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.