W.P.(CRL)/975/2025 of ROHITASH KUMAR MEENA Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- ROHITASH KUMAR MEENA (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (2)
- constitution of india, 528 (1950)
- indian penal code (1860)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 975/2025
ROHITASH KUMAR MEENA
.....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Nusrat Hossain and Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC(Crl.) and
Mr. Alok Sharma, Adv. SI Pawan Kumar, PS M. Nagar. SI Pawan Kumar, PS M. Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R R% 26.03.2025
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CRL.M.A. 9133/2025(exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 975/2025
3. The present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks
the following prayers: -
“a. Issue an appropriate Writ, order, or direction directing the Ld. Trial Court to expedite the proceedings and dispose of the pending Trial in Case No.8077/2024 arising out of case FIR No.302/2022, U/s 419/420/120B/34 IPC, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar pending before the court of Ms. Amardeep Kaur, Hon’ble CMM, North District, Rohini Court, New Delhi within time-bound period as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court;
b. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction to the respondent authorities to ensure that no unnecessary adjournments or delays occur in the trial, and that the prosecution produces its witnesses authorities to ensure that no unnecessary adjournments or delays occur in the trial, and that the prosecution produces its witnesses
without delay;
c. Pass such further order as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.”
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition at this stage. withdraw the present petition at this stage.
5. Leave and liberty granted.
6. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of.
7. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.
MARCH 26, 2025/kr/sc
AMIT SHARMA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any