CRL.M.C./900/2023 of RAHIL NARULA & ORS. Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
Parties
- RAHIL NARULA & ORS (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (2)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 900/2023
RAHIL NARULA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Arpit Verma, Mr. Chankya Gupta & Ms. Nandini Chadha, Advs. Gupta & Ms. Nandini Chadha, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State. SI Rahul Malik, P.S. Maurya Enclave. Mr. Jeetin Jhala & Mr. Shakunt Jhala, Advs. for R-2 to 6. State. SI Rahul Malik, P.S. Maurya Enclave. Mr. Jeetin Jhala & Mr. Shakunt Jhala, Advs. for R-2 to 6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
% 22.01.2025
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of the FIR No. 47/2021 under Sections 288/304A/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Maurya Enclave, District North West, Delhi and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. of the FIR No. 47/2021 under Sections 288/304A/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Maurya Enclave, District North West, Delhi and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. withdraw the present petition.
4. Leave granted.
5. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. accordingly.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
JANUARY 22, 2025/nk
AMIT SHARMA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any