NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

WRIT PETITION 9498/2024

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2025-02-21
Case number
9498/2024

Parties

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Paragraph

$~38 & 39

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

38 + W.P.(C) 9498/2024 APARNA VIJAYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. (VC).

versus

CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advs. for R-1/CBSE. Mr. S. Rajappa R Gowrishankar, Ms. G. Dhivyasri, Advs. for R-2 (VC).

39 + W.P.(C) 10311/2024 SHRISHTY VIJAYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. (VC).

versus

CBSE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advs. for R-1/CBSE. Mr. S. Rajappa R Gowrishankar, Ms. G. Dhivyasri, Advs. for R-2 (VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

O R R% 21.02.2025

Learned counsel for CBSE submits that vide e-mail dated 14.01.2025 they have already intimated the concerned school that their request regarding correction in Candidates’ Name and Candidates’ Fathers’ Name

has been approved by the competent authority of the Board.

In these circumstances, let petitioners deposit the correction fees along with the original documents of the candidates in their respective schools.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in these circumstances, the petitions may be disposed off with the directions to the school to process the application being submitted by the petitioners.

In view of the above, the present petitions along with pending applications stands disposed off. The schools are directed to process the applications being submitted by the petitioners in accordance with the law.

FEBRUARY 21, 2025/AR/SMG..

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J