BAIL APPLN./781/2024 of RANJEET@CHANDER Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 781/2024 RANJEET@CHANDER (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~3 and 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
(3)+ BAIL APPLN. 781/2024 RANJEET@CHANDER ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puran Sharma and Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advs. RANJEET@CHANDER ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puran Sharma and Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with SI Rahul Ranjan, P.S. Harsh Vihar.
(4)+ BAIL APPLN. 1588/2024 HIMANSHU SHARMA @ HIMANSUHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. K. Pandey and Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advs. with Parokar.
versus
THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with SI Rahul Ranjan, P.S. Harsh Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R R% 22.04.2025
CRL.M.A. 13828/2024 (Exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 1588/2024
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.The application stands disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 781/2024
BAIL APPLN. 1588/2024
3.The learned counsels for the petitioners, on instructions, seek
permission to withdraw the present bail applications, at this stage, as it submitted by Mr. Raghuinder Verma, the learned APP for the State, on instructions, that the material witnesses are yet to be examined.
4.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to move the fresh bail application after the examination of the material public witnesses.
5.Permission to withdraw, with liberty, as prayed for, is granted. 6.The bail applications stands dismissed as withdrawn. 6.The bail applications stands dismissed as withdrawn.
SHALINDER KAUR, J
APRIL 22, 2025/sds/sk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any