BAIL APPLN./2708/2024 of MOHIT Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI & ANR.
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 2708/2024 MOHIT (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2708/2024MOHIT.....PetitionerThrough:Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Mr. Raghav Vij,Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advs.MOHIT.....PetitionerThrough:Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Mr. Raghav Vij,Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondent
Through:Mr. Aashneet Singh, APPSI Mahendra Patel, PS NarelaSI Mahendra Patel, PS Narela
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R R%27.01.2025
1.Mr. Kansal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that substantialprosecution evidence is over.prosecution evidence is over.
2.He limits his request only to the fact that the entire prosecutionevidence be completed expeditiously and preferably within 4 monthsfrom today and seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty tofile fresh bail application after the prosecution evidence is over.evidence be completed expeditiously and preferably within 4 monthsfrom today and seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty tofile fresh bail application after the prosecution evidence is over.
3.It is expected that the Trail Court will conclude the prosecutionevidence expeditiously as only 4 prosecution witnesses are left.evidence expeditiously as only 4 prosecution witnesses are left.
4.Granting the aforesaid liberty as sought by the petitioner, the petitionis dismissed as withdrawn.is dismissed as withdrawn.
5.It is clarified that as and when the bail application is filed, the sameshall be decided in accordance with law.shall be decided in accordance with law.
JANUARY 27, 2025/sp
JASMEET SINGH, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any