BADRI PRASAD versus DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.
Parties
- BADRI PRASAD (PETITIONER)
- DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS. (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
BADRI PRASAD
DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.
August !st, 1978
lV. R. KRISHNA IYER, D. A. DESAI AND 0. CHINNAPPA RUDDY, JJ.J
Presumption in favour of valid marriage, law rega,rding-Law leans in favour of legitin1acy-Proof by eye-witness evidence after half century not permissible. Dismissing the special leave petition, the Court HELD : If man and Vi'oman who live as husband and wife in society are compelled to prove, after half-a-century of wedlock by eye-witness evidence that they Vi'ere validly married fifty years eariler, feVi' will succeed. strong presumption arises in favour of wed-lock where the partners have lived together for Jong spell as husband and wife. Although the presumption is rebuttable, heavy burden lies on him who seeks to deprive the relationship of its legal origin. Law leans in favour of legitimacy and frowns upon bastardy. [l F-H]
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 1731 and 927 of 1978.
From the Judgment and Order dated 3-11-76 of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) in W.P. 116 of 1971 and from the Judgment and Order dated 5-8-77 of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) in Revision Application No. 29/77 respectively.
R. K. Garg, Madan Mohan and V. J. Francis for the Petitioner._
The Order of the Court was delivered by
KRISHNA IYER, J.-For around 50 years, man and woman, as the facts in this case unfold, lived as husband and wife. An adventurist challenge to the factum of marriage between the two, by the petitioner in thi~ special leave petition, has been negatived by the High Court. strong presumption arises in favour of wed-lock where the partners have lived together for long spell as husband and wife. Althongh the presumption is rebuttable, heavy burden lies on him who seeks to deprive the relationship of legal origin. Law leans in favour of legiti-macy and frowns upon bastardy. In this view, the contention of Shri Garg, for the petitioner, that long after the alleged marriage, evidence has not been produced to sustain its ceremonial process by examining the priest or other witnesses, deserves no consideration. If man and woman who live as husband and wife in society are compelled to prove, half century later, by eye-witness evidence that they were validly married, few wi.ll succeed. The contention deserves to be negatived and we do so without hesitation. The special leave petitions are dismissed.
Petitions dismissed.