WPSS/29/2001 of TANSEN BALMIKI and ORS. Vs STATE and ORS.
Parties
- WPSS/29/2001 of TANSEN BALMIKI and ORS. (PETITIONER)
- The State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Nagar Vikas, Government of Uttaranchal. 2. The Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Rishikesh …… Respondents ………… (RESPONDENT)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 29 of 2001 (S/S)
1.Tansen s/o Late Hardwari Lal2.Raj s/o Santa3.Billa s/o Mukunda4.Bhola s/o Bakhtawar5.Madan s/o Sadhu6.Smt Nanki w/o Pyarelal7.Smt. Guddi w/o Shiv Charan8.Smt Kamlesh w/o Shyam Sundar9.Smt. Phullo w/o Om Prakash10.Smt. Sudhila w/o Madan11.Smt. Kela w/o Kalu12.Smt. Shila w/o Rishi Pal13.Firangi s/o Raghu14.Smt. Premo Devi w/o Phul Singh15.Bablu s/o Mahendra16.Vinod s/o Chuttal17.Vijay s/o Veer Singh18.Kiran Pal s/o Sukh Ram19.Rakesh s/o Kishan20.Mahesh s/o JabbiAll residents of Railway Road,Balmiki Nagar, Rishikesh, District Dehradun…..Petitioners
Versus
1.The State of Uttaranchalthrough Secretary, Nagar Vikas,Government of Uttaranchal.2.The Executive Officer,Nagar Palika Parishad, Rishikesh…… Respondents…………..
Sri Pramod Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners.Sri Harendra Belwal, Advocate for respondent no. 1.None for respondent no. 2.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J.Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.
RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral)
Sri Promod Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners.Sri Harendra Belwal, Advocate for the respondent no. 1.None for respondent no. 2.
2.Sri Promod Belwal, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
permission to withdrawn the writ petition.
3.Permission granted.
4.The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Tandon, J.)(Rajeev Gupta, C. J.)
4.9.200604.09.2006