NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

BA1/290/2019 of HAKAM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date
2019-12-16
Case number
290 of 2019

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Arguments

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction 1st Bail Application No. 290 of 2019

Order on bail application of the accused

Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.

Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Brief Holderfor the State and perused the records.

The applicant is in jail being implicated in Case Crime No. 1098 of 2018, under Sections 3/5/11 of Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act and 3/11 Cruelty Upon Animal (Prevention) Act, registered in Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is falsely implicated and all the sections are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that co-accused, namely, Rahish @ Chota has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 13.02.2019 in Bail Application No. 280 of 2019. He further submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 11.12.2018.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as on the ground of parity, this Court is of the opinion that applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing personal bond and

furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of disposal of bail application. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.

14.02.2019 Aswal

(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)