BA1/89/2019 of GOPAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- Gopal … Applicant (in jail (PETITIONER)
- State of Uttarakhand … Opp. Party (RESPONDENT)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
1st Bail Application No. 89 of 2019
Order on bail application of the accused
Gopal … Applicant (in jail) Vs State of Uttarakhand … Opp. Party
Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
Heard Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. J.S. Virk, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
The applicant is in jail being implicated in FIR No. 08 of 2018, under Sections 328, 379 & 411 of I.P.C., registered in Police Station Jhabreda, District Haridwar.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no recovery of tractor from the possession of the applicant. He further submits that there is delay of five days in lodging the FIR. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.09.2018.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable local sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of disposal of bail application. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.) 10.01.2019 Aswal